He doesn’t need to expound. Bad take is sufficient here. It’s a bad take.
I’m able to extrapolate why this is a bad take; and I agree.
We don’t always have to write lengthy prose to get our points across.
“Brevity is the soul of wit.”
Discussion
You don’t have a point at all. You have no argument for how zaps are different from social credit. Your one attempt was an assertion that some people on a completely different social network have done work that deserves pay, and you didn’t even have a single example of that.
You people are literally going to usher in a dystopia and you don’t even care because all that matters to you is your crypto gambling addiction.
You’re argument is simply not worth more than a sentence. Even that is too much.