It's something I've advocated for years. There shouldn't be rules. So bans.
How can people live in harmony when there are no bans :)
There are fewer fights than in systems with bans.
The best example of this is the world of NOSTR. 🫶
The Bluesky environment is less prescriptive than Twitter. But (my list) I witness so many fights...
Apart from that, "they should come, these should not come" discussions.
Attempts to emulate everyone.
I think that is foolhardy. Without the rules no one would know what is broken. So by your logic everything works just fine.
Bans may be to your liking.
I never loved. I can understand the truth. And I don't do them.
For example: My reason for not being a murderer is not because of fear of punishment. Because it's wrong.
I say that if the rules, or prohibitions, had guided people to the truth, there would not have been so much violence. And this is my observation about the 3 platforms.
This is my own experience.
Is it stupid?
Alright. I'm stupid.
I'm happy to be an idiot who doesn't like prohibitions :)))
We lived in the world you described for thousands of years and yet people created rules. I agree with your logic, fully, but you all get burned on bad decisions and you make it someone else's problem to fix. That's just how you are. Single celled organisms live like you think and I agree with it, but it will never be so. Just saying.
Just because it will never happen doesn't mean we won't defend it.
Let's defend what we think is right. Of course, we will continue to live in this disgusting world. Because the majority will never be able to live harmlessly like single-celled organisms. They will make the world hell with rules and prohibitions :)
At least I will continue to defend what I see right :)
Your life, your choice.
It already happened and we supposedly found it wanting. And single celled organisms are some of the most murderous organisms alive but that's just it, they just try to stay alive. They couldn't invent a religion, they grew tiny hairs to propel them faster.
