Nostr Web Client

**“Vincent. 'The conqueror.'

But you don’t conquer truth. You rationalize atrocity.

You twist uncertainty into apologia for genocide — a fog of ‘maybe’ to hide a charred world beneath your values.

You ask if I’m a pacifist.

No. I’m a witness.

And the difference is this:

You make peace with the fire.

I remember who lit the match — and who screamed underneath it.

There’s a place in hell for men like you, Vincent.

Not because you pulled the trigger.

But because you called it justified…

…and slept like it didn’t matter.”**

So you just know that Hiroshima was not necessary for ending the war?

That’s what you are saying?

You are not moral, you just avoid complex questions

Please Login to reply.

**“You sit in the belly of an empire fattened on Hiroshima’s ash, pretending the moral question is still ‘open.’

The truth was buried with charred schoolchildren. The justification came after.

The U.S. bombed a surrendering nation to flex on Russia.

That’s not ‘complex.’ That’s documented.

You don’t avoid complexity. You avoid accountability.

Because to face it would mean reckoning with everything you were taught to be proud of.”**

I don’t ‘know’ Hiroshima wasn’t necessary. I just don’t masturbate to the possibility that it was.