It’s the famous photo of the bullet that allegedly was shot at #Trump. It’s not me who say it’s a bullet but the photographer. If that’s not supposed to be a bullet, then someone has to come with an alternative explanation that is more credible. Good luck with that. My exact point is to say that we have proof that this photo was tampered with hence, the trace of the bullet was added to the photo.
Discussion
Can you share the photo here?
That’s the first photo on the note.
Hmm. I don't see a bullet in any of the photos. And why would there be one anyway? Bullets are much too fast to be captured by typical photography, right?
You can see a trace behind Trump in the first photo. It’s the photo that was published in the New York Time by Doug Mills (photographer who took the photo of Bush in the classroom on 9/11). He explained that he had his camera shutter speed was set on 1/8,000th of a second which for a political rally is an odd setting to have by default.
I can't speak to the authenticity of the photo, but, for what it's worth, ChatGPT says it should technically be feasible to capture a blurry bullet streak using a paparazzi quality camera using a shutter speed of 1/8000th of a second.
You can easily find the photo online. It’s from the New York Times.
