Anarchy served Homo Sapiens well for a few hundred thousand years.
This "Statism" experiment only became a global majority around ~1500 AD, and its never been stable.
Discussion
Anarchy by definition is unstable.
I'm all for death and rebirth of fallen decay, but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.
We don't even live remotely close to a hundred thousand years ago and without civilization advanced technology would likely not exist (medication, education, etc. requires society) - assuming you want/like the tech we have now.
I have my life because of advanced tech and so do a lot of people in the world. How do we move forward? No middle ground / all or nothing?
"We don't even live remotely close to a hundred thousand years ago"
Young Earth creationist? Going by the available evidence, our species did. The evidence could be "testing our faith", of course, if that's your thing.
"and without civilization advanced technology would likely not exist (medication, education, etc. requires society) - assuming you want/like the tech we have now."
Anarchy is without the State, not without society.
"Anarchy by definition is unstable."
Anything can be unstable by somebody's definition.
This would make a great podcast!