This is the fallacy in the west. I hate all the governments, however the left in the west has this tendency to pretend being for the greater good and funding public services with tax money which is usually their smoke-screen and rug-pull.

The right on the other hand pretends so hard that these neo-liberals are communists or socialists without understanding that Marx' topics focus on economy, capital and distribution of goods, labour and money. Not sexual orientation, personal life-style or race. Agree or disagree with his freedom of speech, but atleast represent things accurately and not make false comparisons is what I say to the westen "right". Their smoke-screen is freedom-love to cover up war against China instead of the middle east and Russia that the dems and republicans alternate between targetting.

In europe left and right mean various different things in those countries. The social democrats seem to be what we call conservatives in the west, and the Pro USA parties are pushing LGBT indoctrination, decadence bankruptcy.

The communists in china are beating the Anglo-Saxon-American capitalists at their own game, and Europe is going bankrupt due to being cut off from cheap energy at the orders of the masters in the west.

2025 is going to be interesting on both domestic and international relations levels.

I think the terms communism, left, right, capitalism aren't relevant in todays world anymore. They dont exist.

There is so much overlap, and right wingers who agree with some left wingers on certain issues and vice versa.

The biggest concern these days for most places is "DOES YOUR LEADER LOVE YOUR COUNTRY AND DID LIFE IMPROVE?"

I dont see any of that in the west, and alot of it in the east....

The American century is over and the baton has passed.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I go with you that too many focus too much on boxes as left end right. May we should accept, that we are in the era of information. And rather focus on arguments instead of the person who is expressing it.

Since in the end it does not matter if it is Trump or Biden, Kamala or Musk. Or whatever person in the world. I think what matters most is the decisions we all take. And if we can legitimate those in a way, that is reasonable to others.

Since we as free people are quiet good in seeing the difference between good and bad in atomic actions.

Is peace or war preferable?

Is liberty or slavery preferable?

Is equality or monarchy?

Power to the people or power to the rich?

Better argue with words or violence?

Better to convince or to threaten?

I see it as a good habit to qualify atomic actions instead of persons as a whole.

I like that elon musk is driving innovation for electric cars, hyperloop transportation and space transportation, since it gives more opportunities to humanity.

I dislike how Musk is using his financial power to boost his words over those of other people threw to buy of twltter.

Musk is getting senile

i think for a long time he really tried to deliver good services and goods to humanity. Now it seems he tries to use his trust and power to increase his influence and is becoming more and more narcisitic and egocentric.