The use case is being able to speak without risk of censorship. We just need more important people saying more important things here. Journalists breaking big stories that otherwise would be shut down on centralized platforms for instance.

The problem isn’t so much the protocol, it’s the people using it.

If you want more people to use NOSTR, create an environment for people who would otherwise be silenced to be free. And I’m not talking about niche Devs.

How Reasearchstr, a place where academic papers can be published that maybe aren’t going to make the lancet because the findings aren’t to the fancy of proctor and gamble or unilever.

Or Teachstr, a place where teachers can get together and form real curriculums outside of the confines of what federally funded public schools can provide.

The value is rules but no rulers right? The natural product-market fit is to cater to environments that thrive with minimal oversight.