They pled guilty, in my opinion, because this shit is never going to end and they will eventually run out of money. Idk what the term is called but I've seen this happen with gun cases. The state can have a lawsuit go on indefinitely. In the meantime, you sit in prison or on house arrest. You have no income or livelihood.
Discussion
Then again, this case took place in the same state where a judge literally said that the Second Amendment doesn't exist in her courtroom.
The constitution doesn't matter. All that matters is sheep still believing that it matters.
The SDNY literally said that sw is not a money transmitter. If my memory is correct, I believe the judge forbid the lawyers from using that statement in their defense. How can an impartial judge impose a rule like that?
FinCEN said they didn't require a license too.
Right. I found the note
If you read the article carefully you'll see that they're not arguing they required a license.
They're just arguing that they conspired to move stolen money.
So by not making it about the license requirements it may have actually worked *against the defense.
How would they even prove it was stolen money? This is so fucking retarded
100%
being the target of these kind of cases is literally hell and you have to be insane to spend your life fighting it.
just being principled isn't enough usually.