He does seem to go overly hard on trying to make them look stupid, I am not sure why. He could have easily critiqued without this flashy angry angle. But a lot of what he says resonated. I too considered both pseudoscience wannabe crybabies desperate for attention fraudsters. But if I had to point out their flaws, I wouldn’t call them any of that 🤣
Discussion
I like to think I'd be able to wade through a fair amount of ad hominems to sift out the moments of sincere critique. False assertions of fact are a different matter.