Replying to joern

The eve impersonator can’t sign messages with the private key of the public key which belongs to @jacks profile. On some profiles you see the purple NIP05 checkmark, which would be another indicator.

For example if I own joern.com I could link the public key of this @joern username to joern@joern.com. To do so I need access to the configuration of that domain. Fraudsters can’t do that too.
1f
joern 2y ago

#[2]

for example linked his pubkey to cash.app by placing this to the cash app domain https://cash.app/.well-known/nostr.json?name=jack

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

45
Ben G. 2y ago

Got it! So linking to a website is a form of verification. Are there other ways to signal that you’re the real person besides linking to a site?

7a
7a56f8bd... 2y ago

You can upload a selfie with your pubkey written down on a piece of paper or link your key on your other social media accounts like twitter, instagram or whatever

7a
7a56f8bd... 2y ago

Not sure if this is still a thing but there used to be 'key exchange parties' where people can meet in person to exchange their public keys

1f
joern 2y ago

Yeah, sure we can also exchange keys via third comms channel and the UI would ideally indicate that you know one but not the other.

45
Ben G. 2y ago

Is that a new paradigm shift in this web3 world… the burden to prove authenticity is on the user?

1f
joern 2y ago

No, ideally the clients do it for you and give you the hints. It’s like https and the green lock in your browsers address bar. Back then it was just a lock, then warnings became more sophisticated. It’s just a matter of time until it will get build into the clients here but fundamentally it’s the same cryptographically verifiable trust relation.

45
Ben G. 2y ago

Also, what’s stopping Facebook from just assigning/exposing a public key for every user? In that scenario, Jack could just link that key to the cash.app site as well to prove his identity

1f
joern 2y ago

The difference is that db would control the private key if I understand you correctly. In nostr case you alone own the private key, it’s possession IS the identity, all your messages and comms are signed with it.