Replying to Avatar Rich Nost

It is basically saying that any blocks signaling for drivechains activation will be rejected by nodes as invalid. If there is a significant adoption of URSF by ecnomically important nodes, the miners won't even bother.
Avatar
Gildong.Hong 2y ago

It is hardfork, right?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Rich Nost 2y ago

No it is a constriction of the existing rules for acceptable blocks.

Avatar
Gildong.Hong 2y ago

Then the other softfork(maybe miner driven softfork) becomes hardfork. It seems that the term is not that critical.

Thank you.

Avatar
Rich Nost 2y ago

Two soft forks in disagreement does not equal one hard fork. The rejecting node rejects, and the activating node signals/accepts. All actors take risk in being on the wrong side of a reorg, but the miners have to choose especially carefully, because they have risked their income.