I won't be putting original sources into wiki pages. I will only be linking to the article sources from the pages and maybe quoting an excerpt (until the wikis get around to embedding 30023/30040/30041 events).
Wikis can actually make everyone more ignorant, if you aren't careful, as they put everything up for debate.
Don't want to end up with people clicking on a link from a wiki page I've written, tracing back to the topic list, and being bombarded with parodies, sloppy copies full of errors, and fanfiction versions of Genesis 2, The Fountainhead, or Plato's Republic. We would quickly reach the point where nobody knows what the original content was.
That's all well and good, and have fun with that, but that's not why I'm doing all of this work.
Is it another influencer from the centralized sphere?
There's literally no point to putting all Nostr content into wikis, yo. The content is all interoperable and everyone is free to publish any event. All of Nostr is a kind of wiki because we let anyone write and edit.
Some events are just more appropriate for certain types of information and others are more appropriate for other types.
You can use the wiki to post your GM notes and social media notes to print the Encyplopedia Britannica and blog using DMs, and nobody can stop you. But people might eventually start muting you, so that they don't have to see the mess you're making, so do that at your own risk.
