All NIPs are equal.
But some NIPs are more equal than others.
Discussion
There are currently 173 pull requests languishing in the NIP project, with no or only half-hearted reviews.
Other pull requests appear and are quickly merged, even if they cover a topic addressed by one or more already in existence.
In IT engineering, like in many other domains, there are better and worse ideas. Some simply require more time to be refined, or are just plain bad. There's also the social aspect to software, since its a community based project.
Yes, it's a big club, but most of the developers aren't in it.
By the "club" do you mean the quality or the social aspect?
If 1, then, yeah most devs are not good. Most devs are average. That's why it's an average, im likely there too, he he
If 2, then I assume that the ppl that started the project, care about it, they are open to suggestions, but since its important to them, they want to assure the quality, so that all of us users, have usable platform and good experience. If everyones pull reqs were accepted, nostr would stop working quite quickly.
Do you know any case where a good nip was rejected?