Correlation can not be considered “a proof” using the scientific method.
Statistics 101:
1)correlation does NOT mean causation.
2) Larger sample data set is more valid than smaller sample data set.
Discussion
Large sample is only more valid if the controls are the same. Sun activities and galaxies movements can be ignored in short periods of time, how do you not consider in large periods of time?
Exactly, well said. We don’t have the data. We can only go off biased assumptions.
So we dont have the data to make any conclusions.
So it’s best not to make any conclusions at all. Rather than push narratives like man and cow farts cause climate change without conclusive evidence.
Clearly, there’s an agenda at play to pushing human and cow farts causes climate change story for politics and has nothing to do with scientific truth.
I agree there is no conclusion. Some say let’s do something based on limited information, the others say fuck it I will do nothing until it has been fully proved. Which side is right? IDK, but remember we are sitting on a human race problem, we may not afford betting it wrong though. PV
It’s not a human race problem.
It’s a ideology problem.
Lack of faith in the almighty.
Rejecting our creator and man trying to play God. A Tale as old as time.
Climate change is human race problem, either human activity driven or not.
I used to believe in the tooth fairy and Santa clause as well. Then I grew up.
Not sure what are you talking about. Are you saying fighting climate change is fairy or climate change is fairy. You are free to believe what you believe. I believe in facts.
You only believe in something when you lack evidence. Like I can’t prove God exists but I believe he exists.
There are plenty evidences to prove 1) greenhouse gas’s impact on climate 2) human activity has released a lot CO2 which was buried underground and not part of natural cycle. The only myth is percentages of human impact. I am afraid I don’t have incentive to help others to find facts. If you believe facts you will find them, if you believe theories you will only find theories.
I don’t argue your religion with God. If I were believer of god’s act then I wouldn’t even make fire to cook in my kitchen because making fire is god’s act as believed by human ancestors. Clearly I don’t understand.
Yep keep rambling the same punchlines and ignore the contrary evidence I provided above.
I thought I pointed out what flaw the ice age evidence has shown. I don’t know what’s part I ignored. That’s OK no one can convince anyone on the internet. If I know you in person would love to talk with you irl. PV