Even if your statement were accurate, the solution isn't to move to a fork that has only a single maintainer. If someone holds your opinion of the situation and promotes that as a solution, it outs them as being completely unserious about the problem at hand.
Discussion
I trust Luke over the current cabal of scumbag shitcoiners. He’s proven his loyalty to the ethos. If more developers join knots your argument evaporates.
Luke had his own bitcoin stolen out from him with some pretty poor security practices and had his servers accessed by unauthorized attackers. Even if you trusted him as an individual, it is a ridiculous proposition to suggest running critical software maintained by this singular individual with this history.
Who stole it?
idk. FBI got involved with the investigation as well...which also got other developers doxxed as a result.
https://cryptonews.com/news/fbi-investigates-bitcoin-developer-event-linked-to-dashjr-hack/