This sounds like keynsian economics tho. Because can't you just as easily say Less regulation = more jobs?

IE as a farmer, if I'm responsible for quality of my meat VS being forced to use an inspected facility, then that facility doesn't have to pay the inspector or they could be apart of their own inspection regime (I'm imagining a co-op of on farm butcher/slaughter trailers that can somehow innovate to drastically drop the cost of slaughtering cleanly OR increase the meat quality at the same price). So same amount of jobs, but it's voluntary. And those who opt out of any "inspection" still have cheaper costs which could allow them to pass those onto their customers to be more competitive on price or hire another farm hand or whatever