maybe this is a hot take but i think it would be a worse look for bitcoin magazine to demonize inscriptions and not engage with it.

inscriptions follow consensus rules and are a part of bitcoin and the culture (like it or not), which is what the magazine reports on.

taking a hard stance against something that is intrinsic to the protocol would be weirdly biased and authoritarian coming from a magazine whose mandate is to report on bitcoin and anything related to it.

i’m sure they’d platform opposing views on inscriptions if anyone wanted to offer a compelling and objective argument, but it seems like most people just want to screech and complain.