idk but in practice it's basically a certain part of the darkweb users that stick with it and the price certainly shows its primary use is exchanging for usd to pay for drugs makes sense

it is not a store of value any more than USD and it is no more private than physical cash stashed under your mattress as far as that goes, except you can buy drugs on the internet with it, or VPN service

there will always be a question about inflation bugs in all privacy coins, which makes them unlikely to have a substantial rise in demand for holding so it's a niche payment instrument for a certain kind of person which is why the personality thing plays such a big role in it

probably the best thing about it, if there can be any good thing, is lowering the amount of on-chain payments that go to darkweb meaning there is more space for other uses, the fee rates on on-chain now are so low compared to the old days

as i understand it, there is some work being done towards enabling state channels with monero but with the difficulties that already exist without complicating it with ring signature CTs i doubt it's ever going to change the fact that nobody is gonna hodl it and this means it's just gonna drift forward as a drug buying currency and that's all it's good for, and the people who love it have really smug, superior attitudes and don't realise the contradiction in bragging about using a privacy coin

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I never thought about how the privacy aspect of it could mask inflation bugs.

In that case though I would assume through testing is the solution to that problem.

inherently incompatible design goals, you see

bitcoin has UTXOs because it is a compromise that enables pseudonymity and mixing while being absolutely accounted for

ethereum uses accounts, which are also problematic for inflation bugs

The bragging about any asset is yes, stupid. Anyone doing so should grow up.

it's a bit worse when the whole purpose of the asset is hiding that you are using it