I think you gotta work on your reading comprehension. Because it literally says the opposite.
Discussion
You didnt read the whole thing. It’s in multiple places.
Let me copy and paste for you:
“paragraph 3, points (a) and (b), of this Article, Member States may take a measure referred to therein, provided that it:
(a)is provided for by Union or
national law;
(b)is in compliance
with Article 52(1) of the Charter and other Union law;
(c)is justified on a case-by-case basis by an overriding reason of public interest and is proportionate; and
(d)is subject to prior authorisation by a judicial authority…”
I did read it. It's the usual exceptions for serious cases, with the usual requirements (existing law && public interest && judicial approval). If you think that's tyrannical overreach, then maybe you need a mother-in-law for scale😅




