Replying to Avatar ActuallyGuy

Actually, it is, along a spectrum. Censorship is not an either/or binary is or is not thing. It moves along a scale from easily censored completely, to mostly censored, to quieted, to openly spoken, to loud and mostly heard without any hindrance.

I'm sure you're trolling point is that "Pubky is more censorship resistant," so, you could have simply said that.

But, the point here is, to say nost isn't "censorship resistant" is inaccurate. That's like saying spf 15 is not UV resistant. It is, but along a scale.
Avatar
Big Bad John 5mo ago

I am not trolling, I am informing.

Instead of mental gymnastics just explain what makes Nostr more censorship-resistant than the web it already relies on.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
ActuallyGuy 5mo ago

Actually, I was informing you about how your term "censor resistant" is misused. I wasn't arguing that nostr is "more censorship-resistant than the web it relies on." So, what you were trying to say would be, "Nostr is no more censorship-resistant than the webit already relies on." That is your argument. Sliding scale.

I'll use another analogy. People often say, "I can't sing." But, of course, they can in fact sing. What they're actually saying is, "I can't sing well, or I can't sing as well as that person. Yet u can still sing better than that person with the frog voice." Sliding scale.