On cue, in a rudimentary way nostr was part of my dream last night, lol. I was struggling to crop a photo on my device to add to a note. The photo was of an intriguing staircase from the interior of a middle eastern restaurant where I was staying as a guest with family friends. The finished interior and occupants would only appear by some kind of esoteric revealing technique or spell.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

not in any way as inspiring or elegant of an example as your friend; such a worthy benchmark for how one spends time with one’s tech

Love to share my musings with you later …🐌 #sunday :)

Working on it, going to be a longer piece.

Fractured musings on Tech, Humanity,

AI / 1 (the dark edit:))

* Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Does AI dream of humans or of being human?

* Jules Verne – I devoured his books as a child, dreaming myself into his world. Captain Nemo in his "Nautilus" - my ideal father figure. As the first author to center scientific and technological processes in his novels, he depicts a world where people live in peace and respect within a technological adventure. Technology is employed as an extension of human capability – but above all, to protect the human essence. Tech optimism as a shaping influence.

* "Paris in the Twentieth Century" - the tragic struggle of an idealistic young man for happiness within a relentlessly materialistic dystopia that the French capital has become by 1960. Jules Verne's last book, published posthumously in 1994.

* Mastering a prosthesis requires dealing with loss. My Friend in the wheelchair serves as a teacher, showing us that growth is multidimensional, and that real beauty is decouplet from standarts. How do the not constrained, handle losses: the loss of privacy, the loss of faith in liberal democracy, the loss of a naïve, utopian worldview amidst concerns for the future ? („Be more resillient!“)

* Belief in technology and AI presupposes a deterministic tech optimism

* I see a disappearance of our motivation to shape our future. Do we leave it to Technocrats to define how our world will look in the future?

* Extremism fills the void created by a lack of education – obsessive AI usage through their Fallibility can fuel new forms of extremism.

* The changing significance of technology: from industrial techniques that standardize to a technological postmodernity that reaches for singularity – the special, the spectacle, even. What remains still special for us today?

* Democracy cherishes the individual, while in a dictatorship, the individual is irrelevant. Does the same apply to technocracy?

* Technocrats want to reduce bureaucracy, but replace Huamans with *merciless AI pedants.

Thank you for sharing these thoughts. I will sit with them awhile.

nostr:npub1pvgcusxk7006hvtlyx555erhq8c5pk9svw57snlxujpkgnkup89sekdx8c I would like to invite you to chat a little ..