I think that bot is just a troll who is dying for attention, because neither NIP seems to be about content warnings or language...
NIP-068 Blinded Nostr Assets
and
NIP-69: Bringing BNS Names to Nostr
https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/250
https://forum.stacks.org/t/nip-69-bringing-bns-names-to-nostr/14293
Discussion
The most exciting is censorship of free speech? gfy.
Hate to break it to you, but someone replying to your post to say something you don't like is not censorship. It might be a jerk move, discourse, a debate, enlightening, harassment... but it's not stopping you from posting anything.
Feel free to call anything you don't like "censorship" though. Like I said, nobody can stop you. 🤣
check/approve/remove = censorship
Seems like just blocking the bot would suffice, no? You can't censor the bot, but that doesn't mean it ever has to show up in your feed.
The bot seems pretty pointless to be honest. Even for people who think the idea of content labeling is wonderful, unless clients have a way to filter out content that the bot replied to, then the only point seems like it'd be to supposedly appease Apple and Google, I guess.
And I'm not trying to defend this bot, I'm just trying to understand their argument, and it just doesn't make much sense to me. 🤷