I haven’t, nor do I plan to.

I get the whole jist of it through what he’s explained on podcasts and various other interviews, I’ve also have had countless explanations from the force projectoooors.

I don’t subscribe to it, it just feels completely unnecessary, I’ve explained many times that I don’t agree nor disagree with the thesis as it’s just down to pure perception, he’s feeding his own idealogical narrative of what he thinks Bitcoin should be, when in fact at the core fundamental principle Bitcoin is just technology.

I’ve explained in many arguments already that Bitcoin doesn’t empower the state, and it in fact does the complete opposite and disempowers them, as it removes their main function of control in the first place.

POWER PROJECTION: (or force projection or strength projection), in international relations, is the capacity of a state to deploy and sustain forces outside its territory.

If you have a technology that makes you question the necessity of state intervention, and seeks to undermine its very power in the first place, then please explain to me why it’s a national security risk for them? The reality is this is driven by the individual, not the state.

The notion such as power projection and war is questioned through the idea of Bitcoin, some might not see that yet but that’s why I’ve explained it’s about perception, it’s what you think it is. Not what you want it to be.