I would argue against. Since opensource projectshas Bitcoin areubased on consensus, it is as stronger as more people understand decisions and argue to have a strong consensus.

Opinion differences do not inforcema better consensus. I would rather argue that they weaken the consensus. Since it leads to conclusions with ilogical premises or no premises at all.

Strong consensus needs strong premises that are logically true and understood by a majority.

For example there will be a very high consens, that speed is the change of position related to time.