nostr:npub1grzww4x4hdt24n0y5703h7yg9u8c8ctatkrs6fvhshwqfac7w8vq6q2pmw nostr:npub16pcnkuannwmpwmu9phqvyg93uavdgdmzgy8cfrzvk7swr98udfus6s8j5n I think this kind of counterfeit rhetoric is particularly problematic in Schedule A cases, because the alleged basis for ex parte asset seizures applies to actual counterfeiting but not to utility patent infringement:
Discussion
No replies yet.