Is the intention to steer more towards notes and less towards other stuff?

Feels like there is a lot of thought spent specifically on the nuances of Twitter clone backends.

A lot of the clients merely copy the formulaic design and layout of Twitter.

Increasingly the community is interesting but the tech differentiation at times fades into a soup of Not-Twitter,-Twitter.

Do we really need to look backwards?

I understand the “if it works, it works” argument, but if it truly works why recreate it in the first place?

Would be great to see true diversity, and a protocol that is simple enough and light enough to support that.

The protocol should not wear jewellery.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.