Chewing on this…

Are we taking it as a given that property rights should only apply to something that has scarcity? I’m tempted to disagree with that premise but haven’t thought hard enough about it yet.

I can understand the nuance/conflict over “owning” something that can be replicated at-will, but I don’t think that that, in and of itself, is a sufficient case for the ethical (and effortless) replication and resale of someone else’s skilled work.