Interesting. Those responsible for the current narrative always omit part of the truth. They seem to believe that we will interpret the facts incorrectly. We may well be accelerating global warming but we are in a warming cycle. I am interested to know more about what the earth was like when it was warmer and wetter than it is today
One of the things I almost never see mentioned in the various climate debates is the observation that Earth is historically on the cooler side and is rising from that very low base.
The planet has historically gone through multiple cycles of not having polar ice caps and then having them again, etc. Over millions of years. There's been a really long-term feedback loop there.
I'm not a climate scientist by any stretch, but I just find that general omission in public discussions around it to be interesting.
https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/whats-hottest-earths-ever-been
Discussion
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1120177109
On the graph in this link it shows, that before industrialisation there was no big chenge in climate. So it is most probably that it would be a change similar to before where the fastest change was in 900 to approx. 100after christ, where there was almost an increase of 0.4°C in 100 years.
If it would be warming more without human intervengen since 1900 is not even cleary from this graph since before industrialisation it is almost horicontally.