A minimal UTXO size of 1M sats is considered good practice nostr:note1cnfn433k3grx6atrljr3vv6us9fl4dv4eejyaj7uyju5fws7jlqq6v4p93

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I disagree with that.

It really depends when you’re going to be spending them.

For the long-term, never selling bitcoin, yes 1M should be minimum.

But if you believe that eventually 1 sat will equal 1 dollar, and you plan on spending some of that bitcoin…

A mixture of UTXOs under 1M is totally fine. Also better for privacy.

Just my opinion.

Exactly!

This is also the reason why I doubt that the transaction fees will spike in future.

Think about it. A lightning channel opening is around 200vbyte big.

With a fee of 10sats per vbyte this means you have cost of around 2000 sats. When when we are at 1 sat = 1 dollars doing transactions will become ridiculously expensive

So I personally think that we will never see the high fee market everyone predicts.

I’m with you.

Although I don’t think the overall demand of block space will rise significantly over that time, there will be much less entities using Layer 1.

So the net will be increase demand and I do think it will be more expensive (in dollar terms) but think it will hover around 20-50 sats/vb