Ours wont but Saylor is actively discouranging NEW participants with shit like - Banks can be trusted and 6102 was voluntary.

More nodes make the network secure and Bitcoin needs good quality Bitcoiners otherwise the state can co-opted it. Assuming Bitcoin is simply win is naive.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Most people come to Bitcoin simply to make more fiat. A percentage of those people will fall down the rabbit hole and become real Bitcoiners.

However, I think onboarding more people in any fashion is important.

I know it’s an unpopular opinion but I feel like Saylor is playing 3D chess and knows that if he pitches Bitcoin as the revolutionary technology that it is it will be seen as more of a threat and attacked.

Bitcoin winning is not a forgone conclusion but having a significant portion of global wealth on our side would sure help.

Perhaps. Saylor once said something about a swarm of cyberhornets. Saylor/everyone else should know they are still out there to sting you if they sense a threat. That's all.

Agreed the social layer of Bitcoin is extremely important to call out potential threats!

Yup. Thanks for the zaps. 👊

Anytime fren