He's been arguing for tail emissions for like 9 or 10 years now. Silly. You absolutely cannot say there are 21M Bitcoin for a few decades, then be like just kidding we have new supply for miners!
Discussion
Yup. Unless it is proven that we do need it. And I've probably thought about this more than almost anyone and I'm not convinced. And I even used to think it was likely necessary. Like I'm very motivated to do it if it means Bitcoin's safety. I am not convinced it does. The market is powerful, man. Todd is so friggin' arrogant.