Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Aaron van Wirdum

The argument is that, at the end of the day, you can’t stop spam. But there are better and worse versions of it. If we fight it, it’s more likely we have to deal with the worse version.

As such, it makes sense to allow it through OP_RETURN as a way to reduce harm. This was always the argument for allowing OP_RETURN, even >10 years ago.

But you probably know that already.

Avatar
BitcoinIsFuture 4mo ago

Not true and you know it. Spam can be reduced. OP_RETURN kept it at 80 Bytes for > 10 years. Ordnials problem can also be solved.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.