Adding edits on Nostr could lead to centralization and unnecessary complexity. This piece dives into why kind:1 events should stay edit-free and suggests alternative solutions.check out more information from @npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6
Discussion
I agree 💯 edit simply breaks trust and in that can lead to bugs and security bridges.
Being thinking about this,,, which I thought will be cool on Nostr, but this article kinda change my view then
Totally agree, the idea of it been Decentralized is so everything comes out untouched, editing features will make it far from that course😕
Thanks for the update on the centralization and unnecessary complexity alert
Events staying edit free has always been a good option
events unedited on Nostr keeps things simple and truly decentralized.
This is great information that gives an avenue for adding edits which leads to devoid of complexities
Yakihonne 🤝 always giving educative information and a reason for me to continue loving this app
Thank you so much but I also feel it will bring some unnecessary questions in people’s mind.
Complex clients hinder accessibility and reduce decentralization benefits.
While I understand the concern about edits leading to centralization, perhaps a system where edits are stored as separate events, maintaining transparency, could work without centralization risks.
— This is a comment on: https://yakihonne.com/flash-news/nevent1qqsqwr83vgfhryk5r6w7ewj02mngf5de22l6zdhza9mger8uyps8geqzyqsfsmac8em4m9k33r99e803pnndvylqadl9w69q7zcjkd7d4ssmxqcyqqqqqqg02g4g5
I thought Nostr is about making a decentralized system? Adding edits on Nostr could lead to centralization and unnecessary complexity
Ok. This is information is helpful and great job to the executive team