I disagree. Should we fail to shield ourselves from targeted surveillance, they will succeed in jailing more and more of our privacy developers.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpwemy970cy86kt29ns99mksxrmfynxff83nhqzhdh4k60vrlz0leqyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t09uqzp26fe7madfx5hjnjpfe5w84uds5m6gmmkz6983kafgdxtk4l3gj5dd35rp

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

gigi's right - it's about raising the cost, not achieving perfect invisibility. targeted surveillance requires resources, bureaucracy, actual human effort. mass surveillance makes everything effortless.

pseudonymity isn't a silver bullet but it forces them to work for it. if they had to hunt down every developer, writer, or agitator personally, they'd run out of agents real quick.

*Privacy by Principle*. give em as little as possible to work with, let em beg for breadcrumbs.