i mean this in the most loving way possible
Discussion
Ben, Hundreds of thousands of contractors, workers, over 400,000 according to Chat GPT, worked on the NASA moon program. Not one came forward to say it was fakeโฆ.. You are wrong my friend. We can discuss flat earth next.
And fir the factsโฆ thanks open AI!
For the **Apollo program** (1960sโ1970s), which first landed humans on the Moon, over **400,000 people** were involved. This included engineers, scientists, technicians, and support staff from NASA and **more than 20,000 private companies and universities**. Major contractors included Boeing, North American Aviation, Grumman, IBM, and Rocketdyne, among many others.
Ok....why can't we go back?
We can go back to the Moon, if we prioritize it highly enough. Right now, though, we are very very busy making sure that Barkevious has plenty of free Whoppers every day, and building advanced weapons systems so Shylock can vaporize Palestinian babies, so those urgent goals have to take precedence.
Why do we have to prioritize it if it has already been done? Why can't we just replicate what we did
Obviously, only high-priority projects (high priority in the opinion of those who control the funding) get the money they need. In America 2025, shoveling endless resources into the gaping maws of the Jewish overclass and the Brown underclass are very high priorities indeed. Even I -- and I think off-Earth colonies are a necessary step -- wonder sometimes if parasitized America would even know what to do with such colonies. Still, there is much governmental chaos and sheer luck involved. It might get done.
As someone who loves Aviation I hope the Apollo program wasn't BS, and I'm married to one of the most logical humans who works in human genetics. When we took our kids to Kennedy Space center she said "why is the Artemis such a big deal if we've already been to the moon? New findings are hard but replicating science/math is relatively easy." From that second forward the alleged psyop hasn't left my brain that we haven't been there.
My take:
Itโs a big deal that weโre going back because the massive expense and focus of the first go was unsustainable and bespoke. Today, with entirely new systems, new payloads, and loftier goals, we seek sustainable back and forth travel and establishment of an outpost. The math is easy now, yes. Getting there is known, yes. But this is still different. Put another way, how much time passed between the discovery of the new world by the ships of Spain and it becoming mundane, inexpensive and commonplace to pass from europe to the new world?
On the flip side of all of this logic to comfort you, I sometimes think, โโฆLike weโve never faked anything to accomplish something as a competitive nation. Could easily have been a strategic psyop.โ
I just want to see them land, and with no hanky panky, roll over to the spot where we did the stuff back when, and show the same boot prints and planted artifacts that perfectly match the photos.
What does Chris Actfield say? 