What do my fellow freedom-loving nostriches think about this? I'm not specifically talking about the Taleb-Peterson beef (actually, it's just Taleb unilaterally screeching, here) about BTC, but Taleb's comments that BTC is not an offshoot of libertarian thought or (Austrian) economics.

I think the man has Bitcoin Derangement Syndrome at this point.

https://cryptonews.net/news/bitcoin/20742487/

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Couldn't care less 🤷‍♂️

I'm with you in that IDGAF what Taleb or any "public figure" thinks about BTC, and even less about any drama they may have between themselves. I was rather referring to the opinion itself that:

“The belief that bitcoin is an offshoot of libertarian and Austrian economics has not a shade of backing… Libertarianism is fundamentally about the rule of law in place of the rule of regulation. It is not about the rule of rule – mechanistic, automated rules with irreversible outcomes… Nor is libertarianism about total distrust.”

I think it's completely wrong, but I wonder if other libertarian-leaning bitcoin-hodling nostrich-riding humans, bots and entities around thee parts think similarly.

Yeah I still don't really care about that correctness of that statement - it just doesn't matter. Trying to place bitcoin into traditional ideologies is a futile exercise. Trust and law now refer to physics and code rather than trust in humans and laws enforced by humans.

Fair enough!

Physics and code supplanting trust and law is a fascinating development for our species.

Don't care, never selling.