That's a rediculous hypothesis

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yes, my hypothesis is exactly as ridiculous as the article's conclusion. The data are not suggesting either. Proper report should say there is a significant difference and we don't know why. Further study would then look into exact diagnosis, clean the data from injuries and move forward.

A conclusion from the data is that you have a lower chance of injury by not getting the shot.

Please elaborate.

Correlation does not equal causation but given the circumstances the vaccine is highly suspect and I don't blame people if they draw that conclusion however without knowledge of the nature of the injuries it is just a strong hypothesis in need of additional data and needs to be stated as such