That's a rediculous hypothesis
Discussion
Yes, my hypothesis is exactly as ridiculous as the article's conclusion. The data are not suggesting either. Proper report should say there is a significant difference and we don't know why. Further study would then look into exact diagnosis, clean the data from injuries and move forward.
A conclusion from the data is that you have a lower chance of injury by not getting the shot.
Please elaborate.
Correlation does not equal causation but given the circumstances the vaccine is highly suspect and I don't blame people if they draw that conclusion however without knowledge of the nature of the injuries it is just a strong hypothesis in need of additional data and needs to be stated as such