Well this is convenient: just as it’s ok to say Covid virus came from a lab in China, Chinese researchers claim to have found a very similar virus in nature (bats), including the first ever furin cleavage site in a spike protein of a coronavirus found in nature (first time in ever was sars-cov-2 ).
HKU5-COV-2 just might be a psyop…or maybe we got bats sick :)
Crossing it back was EcoHealth Alliance's final grant lol
The last episode of No Agenda discussed this:
From the Transcript:
!
1:48:25
Top Yale scientists have found T-cell exhaustion
1:48:29
and prolonged spike protein production in some COVID
1:48:34
vaccine recipients.
1:48:37
And they are saying that, well, it looks
1:48:39
like these people have HIV virus, which I'm
1:48:45
pretty sure we talked about on the show
1:48:47
was actually found in these vaccines.
1:48:50
This was the French Nobel Prize guy that
1:48:54
brought it up.
1:48:55
When he first looked at the breakdown of
1:48:59
the genetics of the COVID itself, he saw
1:49:06
it in there and he thought that maybe
1:49:09
this was part of a system that was
1:49:12
going to be used as a way of
1:49:14
vaccinating against HIV.
You can listen and read the entire show.
Or… “viruses” are cellular debris, PCR tests are meaningless, and in silico “isolation” is actually assembly, and any virus can be “isolated” from any sample with enough PCR cycles
PCR ad Infinitum is meaningless, totally agreed.
But viruses fill that awkward gap between life and molecular machine…they can replicate with access to “real life” cells and and kill both cells and the entire organism (eg, humans).
Are viruses “alive?”
I would argue no, no more so than a prion (one step down the ladder of life). But are viruses weaponizable bags of cleverly assembled cellular debris and DNA? Yeah. Can be used to clear entire continents of people.
You’re the medical doctor, so let me just state first principles as a layman.
I only know for sure that the established consensus must be wrong (it’s acknowledged now that covid vaccines never did prevent disease nor transmission, despite that being their entire purpose)
So the question is only - how wrong are they?
And when I’ve gone to peel that onion back it’s convinced me that the evidence of autonomous self-replicating RNA being the pathogenic cause of any disease is anything but proven.
It seems more likely we’re just observing dying monkey kidney cells under an electron microscope and then in a computer. And that we don’t even have correlation because we deliberately introduce contamination.
The media that has me most persuaded: https://odysee.com/@totaldisclosure:5/The-Viral-Delusion-1:e
