YouTube and the others all low-key hate ad revenue models. That's incredibly fickle revenue and it tends to suddenly crash, anytime the economy slows a bit, whilst the running costs stay up. Subscribers are more loyal.

And the ad revenue sources are often highly political and hit you with one boycott and shitstorm, after another. It's a never-ending nightmare. That's why stock prices for these companies only really get a big bump when they gain subscribers and contracts, not ad revenue.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

✅ EtherFi Airdrop Is Live!.

👉 https://telegra.ph/EtherFi-05-03 Claim your free $ETHFI.

Because ad revenue is tightly-clustered. It's not ad revenue from millions of different accounts; its one big ad agency and it can terrorize your company by pulling all ads at once.

Which could be avoided by not relying on ads. But that clearly isn't possible from the numbers I've seen. I don't see Nostr changing that as a technical solution. It'll require a shift in culture and user expectations. It's already technically possible on Nostr as far as I can tell. And yet the masses aren't pouring in. There's more to it than technology.

IT IZ Early/E*/*ya #painwillpush

Well, we don't have any critical mass, yet. 10% subscribers is more than enough to carry a freemium video model, but 10% of what number?

If you think of what our gitserver costs, you'd probably need a few dozen high-paying subscribers, to get a video hosting service up and running, which means you need thousands of regular users. Until then, someone needs to just bleed the cash.