Discussion
Love this one. Like health care for instance. It's not a human right, but it is a way for us to exercise our mercy and compassion which really is not in health care anymore because it's all about money.
(sic) You are being deceived. Words are taken out of context. Regardless, are we arguing the subject or that someone, prly maliciously, calls something a human right?
That's why privacy isn't a human right, because unless you've got the means and resources to hide away, there's no guarantee that others can't find out what you're up to.
And i'm not saying privacy is useless or that no one should have it, it's absolutely essential nowadays, but it's a privilege, just like wealth.
But that's not the point, is it? Privacy is not about asking people to "unhear". Privacy is about people not putting effort in trying to discover what is none of their business, or presenting bullshit claims that it is "supposedly" their business to know, or that they are allowed to decide what your intentions are and therefore they "need to know".
I would not argue they must be oblivious or cripple their senses. I would argue that they have no right to demand info they aren't privileged to.
#asknostr Is justice a human right?
Meaning should criminal courts be run privately?
What expenses should be borne by the plaintiff? Could the role of the (government) prosecutor be filled by the free market?
Private prosecutors exist, but typically require payment upfront, while government prosecutors decline cases they think they are unlikely to win. Which the free market could do probably. If the prosecutor wins, they are paid by the defendant.
What about "life"?