On a Bitcoin standard, I think we will see less need for individuals that are part of a race/nationality to have to remind everyone that they don’t support everything that members of their “race” do.
This reminds me of how white people try to break away from racist labels or Muslims try to break away from terrorist labels. Race and nationality are shitcoins. nostr:note1l0848ynvs36mvc2mzxfr564ppugrta0paml668fdmum657smy02qetgf9k
It's making me wanna do a diss track to all the trump supporting bitcoiners on NOSTR 🤔
Can we start the track with this? https://video.nostr.build/856fc0571ffdd47d650b0d81da417194fd9191dd939d413fbbc97ab508e7b481.mp4
😂😂😂
✌️
Same bullshit happens with red or blue. I guess this continues to happen because of how rare critical thinking is and how many blind sheep there are in those groups. Tribal groupthink is powerful.
I’m not going to remind everyone that I don’t support everything in any random category I belong to by coincidence or intentionally. Anyone who assumes as such without asking me is prejudiced. I admit I’ve been guilty of making assumptions like that but I aspire to follow the golden rule.
I think with hyperbitcoinization, the need for tribalism trends to 0. The sovereign individual becomes more common and nationality becomes less relevant. People will choose where to live based on what they prefer.
Have you stumbled across Balaji’s network state stuff before?
“A network state is a highly aligned online community with a capacity for collective action that crowdfunds territory around the world and eventually gains diplomatic recognition from pre-existing states.”
