nostr:npub1tr4dstaptd2sp98h7hlysp8qle6mw7wmauhfkgz3rmxdd8ndprusnw2y5g
Which one do we not like again?

nostr:npub1tr4dstaptd2sp98h7hlysp8qle6mw7wmauhfkgz3rmxdd8ndprusnw2y5g
Which one do we not like again?

Also, what is a likely higher-order effect of regularly sending text-strings which represent monetary value:
[ ] more focus on encrypted and private communication
[ ] less focus on encrypted and private communication
Hey look a table that forces you to pick the lesser evil, so convincing
Want to get nuanced?
No need to waste both of our times, I'm familiar with in-depth arguments.
Let me just say this: I'm all for existing custodians to turn to ecash mints. That's not what is happening and it's also unlikely to ever happen.
So no, ecash won't replace existing custodians.