nostr:npub1tr4dstaptd2sp98h7hlysp8qle6mw7wmauhfkgz3rmxdd8ndprusnw2y5g

Which one do we not like again?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Also, what is a likely higher-order effect of regularly sending text-strings which represent monetary value:

[ ] more focus on encrypted and private communication

[ ] less focus on encrypted and private communication

Hey look a table that forces you to pick the lesser evil, so convincing

Want to get nuanced?

No need to waste both of our times, I'm familiar with in-depth arguments.

Let me just say this: I'm all for existing custodians to turn to ecash mints. That's not what is happening and it's also unlikely to ever happen.

So no, ecash won't replace existing custodians.

Why won’t it?

Lack of incentives