Zero benefit and never did? Thats quite the claim, and I’m sure they have some confounder as an explanation for why kids don’t die like they used to back in the day.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Sanitation and personal hygene

No doubt that’s a huge effect, but hasn’t improved much since 1950.

Poison people, blame imaginary viruses, sell vaccines. They were spraying kids and crops with DDT(?) in the 40s and 50s. Polio illness was renamed after the introduction of the vaccine, making it look like the made up virus was eradicated.

https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Toxicology-vs-Virology-Rockefeller-Institute-and-the-Criminal-Polio-Fraud:1

"The Bill Gates funded Vaccine linked to Paralysis in African Children and polio outbreaks."

...

"Africa was officially certified wild poliovirus-free on August 25, 2020. Coincidentally, new vaccine-derived polioviruses began circulating and several outbreaks have occurred in the continent."

I'm sure Bill means well 😅

I thing everyone must agree that in areas where vaccination has an eliminated disease and the risk of a disease is zero then vaccination can mathematically only be harmful. And maybe that’s the case here, I literally don’t know.

But to say categorically that all vaccines are bad because one vaccine eliminated a one disease from the wild and now risk of continued vaccination outweighs benefits is a preface of total-nonsense followed by unassailable logic…and mixing a little truth with a lie is the shallowest way to make the whole thing seem true.

Vaccines have not eliminated any disease. It's not wrong that they changed the definition post-covid.

There's a proper way to test if medicines aleviate illness, and then there's big pharma's "inject dead tissue into test subject's brain and watch it die" method. No science detected.

Vaccines however cause illness - autusm and other in modernity, spanish flu in the past, etc.