Questions you should ask yourself.

How do coinjon like whirpool feel about these rates? 0.1 btc with ten entries in the 5m sats pool costs you just over 450k sats, something like 4.53%.

Why do you keep denying the need for layer 2 solutions?

Why are you so stubborn that you keep ignoring the privacy bonuses for the sender in Ligthning?

Why do you refuse to use Liquid?

Why do you deny the privacy obtained in Liquid by performing simple peg-in and peg-out (and especially if you use sideswap) which are much cheaper than a coinjoin?

These are questions you should ask yourself.

In the world survives the one who adapts.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

With 200 sat/vB ... 8,72% 😂 Luxury privacy for the stubborn

nostr:note1pyvhc2tavdpqa6qlqt0rk5vzkpuexrvqsuefygs7lc6ru8kx98wsjhy623

Why do you (not necessarily you) ignore the benefits of Monero?

Is it pride? Your ego? Stubbornness? We have self proclaimed "maxis" that don't identify as cypherpunks. What the hell are those guys even doing on the Nostr and Bitcoiner/Monero??

I don’t like Liquid because they’re wrapped assets in a federated model. I’d prefer to own native assets.

Whirlpool is almost certainly run by spooks trying to join lots and lots of coins from early stacks. They need normies in the mix just like normies are needed for Tor not to be clearly just spy software.