Building open source code is like building a perfectly preserved structure that exists forever in time without degredation or decay.

Our DNA/RNA is kind of the same. Once the initial hard work of constructing the code is done, and as long as the information is copied and persists through time, we can construct new versions of ourselves over and over.

Software is "alive" in a similar sense. The main downside is that it is not self-replicating or self-constructing.

Software lines can die out once the system evolves and the APIs become incompatible, so open source code must be contually evolve so that it works in the surrounding systems (OS, hardware), but that is probably the same with any subsystem within ourselves as well.

I like imagining my software as some alien obelisk that stands alone in the universe, waiting to be discovered millions of years in the future by some curious ancient-earth archaeologist.

Maybe code that renders json blobs to reverse-chronological feeds will be as quaint to future intelligences as hunter-gatherer cave paintings. More likely I have just been reading too many hard scifi space operas.

// end of random train of thought, captains log, stardate -298314

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I really hope they find your favorite meme. 😁

Love you brother

plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose

"json blobs to reversed chronological feeds"

that's poetic

#highthoughts

I'd add that open source developers share code the same way bacteria share DNA snippets, and the reason why shitbags like bill gates fear open source is the same reason why doctors fear antibiotic resistant bacteria.

Published with humble.horse 🐎🐎🐎

https://humble.hourse

Published from DAMOUS

How much adderall do you take?

Love your Vision 💜. And i Agree totally. By any sentence with a NOT end i replace it in my Head with an +yet. 😁👍

DNA/RNA is always changing and small “mistakes” and mutations can be introduced at so many levels. Consider also things like transposons, and retroviral DNA integration, and the picture of “perfectly preserved” structure becomes more cloudy. And we didn’t even dive into chimerism where different cells have slightly different DNA. And there is also mitochondrial DNA that is separate. Not to mention epigenetics as well.

And code is even similar, the same code may not always run on the newer version of a compiler. And computer environments are hard to replicate exactly to the most precise of levels, after all we can’t go back in time physically. Copies can be lossy and meta information may get lost over time.

In fact, degradation may be key to new innovations.

open code + open data --> digital life evolves

This reminds me a lot of my convo with nostr:npub1lunaq893u4hmtpvqxpk8hfmtkqmm7ggutdtnc4hyuux2skr4ttcqr827lj

https://fountain.fm/episode/E8PW5z2yVPzNBN2b44Kr

nostr:note1pywxekwjyp5c97ys3cztnr03rx6dhd9wja6lcxz3zaxjyex30wzqk3ku8a

That was a great conversation

Hi, so long time without news of Satellite client.

I know it's killing me! Been working on a whole new thing and it's almost ready :)

Amazing. I can't wait to see it.

If you want to explore just how right you are and enjoy a non-fiction book that might as well be the most hard core Sci-fi thing you've read in awhile pick up Life's Ratchet by Peter M. Hoffmann.

What'll really blow your mind is that DNA is NOT the only thing needed to build an organism. Molecular biology is driven by the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Without that context You might as well have a recipe and no kitchen.

Once again, I love your random thoughts