you dont have to use zaps, someone can make a client without them

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

this is like if a gamedev said "Oh, you don't like gameplay loop? make a mod that removes it then"

yer except nostr clients are open source and simple

right, but zapping is integrated into the fabric of Nostr and as long as it's in Nostr it'll be culturally dominant, even if you disable the button on your client.

no nostr can change in any way, if zaps are not great they wont be used much, but it appears they are very useful but the pimping is stupid tho

what nostr is missing is curation tools to remove all the ebegging

need to zap some devs for it kek

right but wouldn't it be better to just not have it cater to ebeggers?

You don't like me distributing cultural meth? Don't smoke it then.

You don't like everybody in the city being in a weird cult? Leave the city then.

I will, and I will start a farming commune.

I JUST NEED A FEW MORE ZAPS, THEN I CAN CONJURE A BARN

BARNS ARE FREE, YOU CAN JUST PICK ONE UP AND CARRY IT HOME WITH YOU

https://youtu.be/qOpjHm6WzVg

HUT HUT HUT HUT HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

you should get them to move your wife

i will murder your commune and take your farm

sorry i mean murder your farm and take your commune

sorry i mean join your commune and marry your cows

I will shoot your dog

its actually a cat that identifies as a dog

but thank you for not misspecieing it

no problem my nigger

you misplet bigger

I meant to say big man, my bad bro

np lets watch some gay porn together

i can share some new bitcoin with you

I'm down watchtogether.thughunters.com

Somehow I doubt that.

tough guy

i have no issue with drugs, people have a right to individual sovereignty, drink bleach if you want, on a biology level let the stupid people delete themselves from the genepool, get tranny surgery, go for it

so called "libertarians" when I hit their wife with my car whilst drunk driving

I suppose that is the underlying principle on which we differ then.

You and I should both know humans don't work that way, if people can get at them, they will use them. It's not about me not having access to them. It's about yet another techbro taking advantages of all the greatest weaknesses of human behaviour because they can, and because it gets money/users, without any thought given to how they're fucking up the collective psyche. Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit did it, and now they're doing it again. But it's okay this time because Jack said "Bitcoin good".

humans will adapt to social media, maybe after a war or two

Humans shouldn't have to adapt to the sub-par vision of techbros who are so socially illiterate that every platform they make only does further damage to normal social interactions. Especially if their shit vision requires a couple wars to pull off. There's a reason Bill Gates and Zuck kept their children away from phones.

social network software doesn't exist in a vacuum, it is used by and for human interaction. so thinking hard about what behavior the network protocol and software ecosystem encourages is also required.

honestly i am okay with zaps but it will shape the network a certain way

I've thought about this a bit recently, but really I think that no matter how good the thing you make is, if you hand it to people who aren't worthy of it, then how can you ever hope for it to be used correctly, much less well?

might be a little too blackpilled, though