Not sure how it works, but I guess you could do both ๐Ÿ˜…

Zaps have economic value which I agree with. In my mind, zaps works like it does here on Nostr but at the same time zaps boosts a review which then jumps up. The more zaps you get on your review the higher up it comes and becomes more noticable. On the other side, this all depends on how a person use reviews. Ex q: are you the person who writes a review and hope for it to be seen?, or are you the person who uses reviews to find for example a good restaurant, museum etc? (Which I do). This all comes down to user experience and if zaps would be of value in positive way.

Just my thoughts โšก๏ธ

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Thanks!

Somehow I think, the important addition could be over google reviews are the filtering options. So you could maybe filter zaps for accounts:

* with more than n reviews

* with certain posted notes

* with certain received zaps

etc, that could help you to filter out the noise.

Or maybe only go for zap count. So if something is zapped by multiple people even low zaps, could be as good as or even better with 1 big zap. And somehow if it is based on Nostr, I feel that the power of community, the power of open sourceness, the power of free market, could help to converge to a good new app. At least in my mind this could be a new app, that is only for reviews.

๐Ÿ’ฏ I totally agree with you ๐Ÿซ‚๐Ÿ’œ

๐Ÿซ‚๐Ÿ’œ๐Ÿงก๐ŸŒธ

So no algo, only filters.

Yes indeed ๐Ÿ’œ