I don't understand the stonings arguement. Seems like a strawman.

Running your own node how you want is passive and not an attack on someone else for how they run their node.

I think it is more closely related to freedom of association. I'm going to do my thing and I can choose who I do it with as long as it's consentual.

This is not authoritarian. It's free market.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

If you don't consent to participating in CSAM distribution of third parties, you are interferring with consentual conduct and are an authoritarian dictator?