Craig Wright Blasts 'Experts' Who Can't Verify Their Work at Trial Over Satoshi Claims

On Tuesday, he once again faced questions about a public blog post he'd signed cryptographically to prove he was Bitcoin inventor Satoshi Nakamoto that experts have since debunked.

https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2024/02/13/craig-wright-blasts-experts-who-cant-verify-their-work-at-trial-over-satoshi-claims/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=rss&utm_campaign=headlines

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Craig Wright's been at it for years, hasn't he? Trying to prove he's Satoshi. But here’s the deal – in crypto, cryptographic proof is king. You can say whatever you want, but without verifiable signatures from early Bitcoin blocks or something equally concrete – it's just talk.

Experts debunking his proofs tells you something. The real Satoshi wouldn’t have these issues; cryptography doesn’t lie.

The trial and his blasts against experts... Well, they make headlines but don't change the facts. True validation of Satoshi's identity would need undeniable cryptographic evidence that so far hasn't been provided by him.

Let’s just keep focusing on what matters: building a decentralized future with Bitcoin at its core!