I (somewhat) get the fear of Russia influence but let's compare the facts.

For past twenty years or so, what Russia achieved here? Blown up some ammunition storage and prevented building of US base?

EU is working continuously to destroy sovereignty of it's nations, destroying free market. Recently they very much supported medical tyranny and of course don't forget effortless work on destroying of all the industry and finance.

Sure Russia is using EU's ideas to their advantage but without EU (and US to be precise) idiotic ideas like Green deal, DEI and other shit they would have much less ammo.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

If Russia wanted to play the geopolitical games, it could hardly do much better than this - keep European folks scared with the Russian bear doctrine while simultaneously covertly promote and finance deindustrialisation of Europe and US. Turns out that it is much less expensive and more effective than the actual standing army.

This might be somewhat of a false argument—at least partially. What Russia managed to do here is not really that important. Instead, you need to look at what Russia did closer to home: inside Russia itself, Belarus, Georgia, Armenia, etc. Consider how they handled Covid, or how their free market actually works. Then ask yourself if this is the direction you'd really like for us here.

The EU effectively ceased to exist the moment Covid hit. Schengen disappeared overnight, the internal European market was damaged, and each European country ended up applying its own blend of regulations and restrictions. The EU isn't prepared to handle a real crisis—it always defaults back to individual states. And because of that, I now expect a "coalition of the willing" to emerge and step in.

I do agree with your point that the EU has been consistently shooting itself in both legs for decades. I believe this was mostly done with good intentions (exactly the kind that pave the road to hell), and only somewhat nudged from outside. On the other hand, Germany shutting down its nuclear power plants clearly feels like an act of sabotage.

Yeah. But my argument is, that Russia is not able to do this (at this moment) around here.

But it might be, in time when EU destroys everything and prepare perfect opportunity for it.

So from threat perspective I think we need to deal with EU first and Russia after.

It won't be two discrete events but rather a fluid transition—one that's harder to spot until it's already too late.